President William Ruto avoided discussing the Finance Bill 2024 during his address following violent protests

- The protests, initially peaceful and organised by Generation Z on social media, turned deadly on Tuesday, June 25
- Despite the youth’s demands to reject the Bill, it passed through parliament and awaits presidential assent
- Ruto claimed the protests were infiltrated by criminals and assured the nation that measures were in place to prevent recurrence
Navigating the Tightrope: Ruto’s Challenge to Reconcile Protests and Fiscal Reforms
As the dust settles on the recent violent protests in Kenya, President William Ruto finds himself facing a complex challenge. While the demonstrations were purportedly aimed at rejecting the contentious Finance Bill 2024, Ruto’s address conspicuously sidestepped any mention of the proposed legislation, instead focusing on the need to prevent such occurrences in the future.
The Protests and the Finance Bill
The protests, initially organized by the youth on social media, quickly turned violent on Tuesday, June 25. The predominantly young demonstrators, born after 1996, had called on Members of Parliament to reject the Finance Bill 2024 in its entirety. However, their demands were not met, as the controversial Bill was passed through parliament with 195 MPs voting in support and 106 voting to reject the proposed law, with three spoilt votes.
Ruto’s Response
In the aftermath of the protests, Ruto claimed that the demonstrations were infiltrated by criminals and vowed to take measures to prevent such occurrences in the future. This stance has raised concerns among civil society groups and opposition leaders, who argue that the government’s heavy-handed approach could further escalate tensions and stifle legitimate dissent.
Balancing Fiscal Reforms and Public Concerns
Ruto’s dilemma is clear: he must find a way to balance the need for fiscal reforms, as evidenced by the Finance Bill 2024, with the public’s concerns and the potential for further unrest. On one hand, the government’s proposed reforms aim to address the country’s economic challenges, but on the other, the heavy-handed response to the protests risks further alienating the public and undermining the legitimacy of the reform process.
The Way Forward
To navigate this tightrope, Ruto must engage in meaningful dialogue with the opposition, civil society, and the protesters themselves. He must demonstrate a willingness to listen to the public’s concerns and address them in a transparent and inclusive manner. Additionally, the government should consider a more measured approach to managing protests, one that respects the right to peaceful assembly while maintaining public order.
Ruto’s challenge is to find a delicate balance between necessary fiscal reforms and the public’s right to voice their concerns. Failure to do so could lead to a further escalation of tensions and a deepening of the political divide in Kenya. The path forward requires a concerted effort to bridge the gap between the government and the people, ensuring that the reform process is not perceived as a top-down imposition, but rather a collaborative effort to build a more prosperous and inclusive Kenya.